|
The Doha Development Agenda (DDA), an ambitious new
round of World Trade Organization (WTO) multilateral
trade negotiations, was launched in November 2001, due
in large part to the strong leadership of the United
States. With 147 participants, the DDA is the largest
negotiation of its kind in history, covering “everything
from cars and corn to communications serv-ices and customs
rules,” according to U.S. Trade Representative.
A successful finale to the DDA will bring new opportuni-ties
for American workers, farmers and businesses.
- Americans will reap economic rewards from bold
action on market access and other initiatives.
- Agriculture: WTO members have agreed to
eliminate trade-distorting agricultural export subsidies,
most of which are used by our foreign competitors,
and expand market access for all U.S. farm products
through tariff reductions and quota expansions.
- Manufacturing: WTO members have established
a framework to expand market access in the DDA for
manufactured products using a “tariff-equalizing”
formula under which high tariffs will be reduced more
than low tariffs. U.S. manufacturers will benefit
since U.S. tariffs on industrial goods average 4 percent,
while foreign tariffs average 40 percent.
- Services: WTO members have agreed to intensify
negotiations to open their markets for services provided
by U.S. businesses in areas such as telecommunications,
entertainment, distribution, construction and engi-neering,
professional services, and computer services.
- Trade Facilitation: WTO members have agreed
to launch negotiations to reform WTO rules governing
customs procedures. Measures under consideration would
cut red tape, scrap unnecessary formalities and clarify
customs procedures, all of which disproportionately
burden small and medium-sized U.S. businesses.
- Additional trade expansion would deliver real results
for many hard-working American families. For instance,
a one-third reduction in existing trade barriers to
goods and services would mean a $2,500 a year increase
in the income of an average American family of four.
A successful conclusion to the DDA will help developing
countries secure more rapid economic growth and reduce
poverty.
- Trade liberalization helps to increase economic
growth and reduce poverty in poor countries.
- During the 1990s, the income per person in “globalizing”
developing coun-tries open to trade rose more than
three-and-a-half times faster than in “nonglobalizing”
developing countries.
- Newly industrialized economies such as those of
Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan have
grown rapidly due in significant part to their openness
to trade over the past four decades. By contrast,
India, a country closed to trade until recently, witnessed
stagnant growth rates of about 1 percent annually
(in per-capita terms) in the 1960s and 1970s and experi-enced
no decline in poverty levels over that period.
- The industrialized nations have committed themselves
in the DDA to ensur-ing that poor countries are able
to participate in the prosperity created by the world
trading system.
- Because 75 percent of the world’s poor live in
rural areas, removing trade barriers in agriculture
is an important step in reducing poverty. Industrialized
nations have agreed to eliminate trade-distorting
agricultural export subsi-dies, most often used by
U.S. competitors, and to reform farm support programs
in the DDA.
- WTO members have agreed to reduce barriers to manufactured
exports from poor countries in the DDA. The World
Bank estimates that manufac-tured goods now constitute
80 percent of the total exports of low-income countries.
- Opening up worldwide trade will improve the plight
of the world’s poor. A successful conclusion to the
DDA could lift more than 500 million people out of
poverty and put $200 billion each year into the economies
of developing countries.
Meaningful trade reforms in the Doha Round would stimulate
worldwide increases in growth and income and lift millions
out of poverty.

Arvind Panagariya, “Think Again: International Trade,”
Foreign Policy 22, November/December 2003.
E. Anthony Wayne, Assistant Secretary for Economic
and Business Affairs, “Trade as an Element of National
Security,” Remarks to the California Chamber of Commerce
while referring to a University of Michigan study,
December 5, 2003.
Glenn Hubbard, then-Chairman, Council of Economic
Advisers, Remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations
referring to a World Bank study, December 3, 2001.
Merlinda D. Ingco and John D. Nash, “What’s at Stake?”
Agriculture and the WTO: Creating A Trading System
for Development 2, 2004.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of the United
States Trade Representative, “Charting a Course to
Prosperity,” July 31, 2004.
William R. Cline, “Trade Policy and Global Poverty,”
2004. World Bank, Global Economic Prospects 2004,
7, 2003.
|